Via the inimitable Leonnard and the Random Recipe Generato that he found, I give you this recipe for Battered Vinigar:
Battered Vinegar Serves 4 You will need: * 50g mince * 20ml vinegar * 120g soft cheese * 60ml cod liver oil * 60ml soy sauce Instructions: 1. whisk the mince 2. saute the mince 3. microwave the vinegar 4. stir the vinegar 5. defrost the soy sauce 6. saute the soy sauce 7. microwave the soy sauce 8. stir the mince 9. blend with the vinegar 10. heat the soy sauce 11. heat the vinegar 12. add one tablespoon of the soy sauce 13. grind the mince 14. flip the vinegar 15. rinse the soft cheese 16. whisk the cod liver oil 17. throw it all away
How about charging a cent per kcal for ready-made food? A 300kcal item would be three dollars. Two cents maybe? That way, I wouldn’t accidentally consume 2000 kcal from a milkshake.
Obama is now president-elect. He won, in large part, because of the economic crisis that we’re now seeing world-wide. The timing was almost perfect, but McCain’s economic ignorance and his identification with the party in power cemented the deal. All Obama had to do was maintain his cool, something he seems to have no problem with, and talk about change. Now, though, as the Onion put it, a Black man has been given the nation’s worst job. Assuming we begin recovering from this crisis in three years, though, he should be a shoe-in for re-election. The president has some influence over the economy, but e we usually give him more credit than he deserves when things go wrong.
No, the thing Obama will have more control over is the deficit. The question is, what will he do? Can he do what Clinton did after Bush Sr’s excesses? Will he be a borrow and spend conservative or a tax and spend liberal? Additionally, he starts out with a clear majority of Democrats in Congress. Will they live up to the worst fiscal fears propagated by Republicans — that they won’t be able to resist pigging out at the taxpayer trough? Or will they show Clintonian fiscal restraint? We’ll know shortly. I can’t wait!
Yesterday, I jumped on my bike at 7:00AM (after fixing a flat), planning to do 30 miles. I got in five miles before I realized I had a dentist appointment. I rushed home, brushed my teeth and verified that I had time to bike to the dentist. 45 minutes, plenty of time. After the teeth cleaning (No Cavities! Whoopee!), I dropped by Panera to work. At lunch, I biked home, bringing my total for the day to 40 miles. I realized it, as I rode home in the 45 degree weather. “I feel great!” I told dvfmama, “I just finished 40 miles in the almost-freezing cold and I feel great!” There are other signs, too. Like the work I’ve been doing to replace the bathroom sink and finish painting the trim. That’s stuff that usually annoys me (even though it annoys me that it sits there, undone), but now I was finally doing it — even finding places where each of my children, including the 3 year old, could help out. I feel great. So, last night dvfmama was asking me why I haven’t written anything on my weblog lately. “I don’t have anything to write” “Sure you do,” she said. “You feel great.” And now you know.
A Christian perspective on what’s wrong with the G.O.P.:
The reality is that voting Conservative does not guarantee that your values will be applied to your country. It guarantees that the candidate who claims to share those values will get to leverage his claimed moral high ground to back his decisions in the press, and on the world stage…
i knew I wasn’t the only one who thought this way. I’m not fond of his pragmatist approach (“Isn’t it better, then, to vote for someone who will put into place a process which will result in your values being applied?“) because I don’t think the application of values is the goal. This is a possible side-effect of the goal (unity with God), but it is not the goal. Just spotted another example of Christian pragmatism in what he wrote: “God gave us His Word because it contains the best plan for His kids. Everything He asks of us makes sense.” Ok, so I think he’s coming from the wrong place, but I like this point of view.
I’ve never been in the military, but this quote sums up my feelings several conversations I have going on. “We won the war, therefore we must have deserved to win.”
My crucial memory, and the memory that really starts all of my other memories about the war is waking up in this pine forest my first morning in the war. It was still dark, but just barely getting light and as it got light, I was astonished to see within 3 or 4 feet of me, several bodies, dead bodies, of German boys who had been killed, I think, the day before by the unit we were relieving. These boys were just exactly like me. And they were killed, their eyes were open, and their faces were as white as marble, greenish-white. And at that moment, when I saw what I was involved in, actually, for the first time — my training had never told me this — many of my adolescent illusions about reason, the governance of the world by reason, and common sense, and the idea of progress fell away all at once. And I realized, in that one moment, that I would never be again in that world of childhood innocence, where the world is run by reason and events contain a certain amount of justice. I knew now that I was enmeshed in a world of injustice and unreason. That I would have to learn how to survive in that world, or how to make sense of it, later on.Paul Fussell Infantryman in US Army 1944-1945
I just got back from a 30 mile ride — which makes 110 miles so far for my first (hopefully) 200+ mile week. As you can imagine, spending time alone on the bike gives me quite a bit of time to think. I use the time to pray, plan my day or just think. This past week, politics have been on my mind quite a bit. It all started at my grandfather’s funeral. His death was not unexpected. He had suffered a stroke the weekend before and died peacefully in his sleep during the week. Still, as an impromptu reunion of my (fairly conservative) extended family during the final days leading up to a presidential election, we had some interesting conversations. Since they all know I worked on a campaign for a Democratic nominee for president when Bush was up for re-election, one of the first questions I’m asked is: “Who are you voting for?” I’ve stepped out of the Protestant, Republican straight jacket, so I’m not quite as predictable politically. (I get the feeling that I experienced a smidgen of what William F. Buckley’s son went through.) Just to be clear: back in 2000, I was rooting for McCain. He was (is?) a man who stood up for what he believed in. I was no fan of Gore and thought McCain was the best of the Republican lot. But no matter. That was during my “I don’t vote” phase. However, in the past eight years, I got to know McCain better. And it seemed like McCain changed. A former victim of torture, he went soft on torture. In the debates, he specifically listed veteran’s benefits and war spending as one of the programs exempt from his idiotic “spending freeze”. If we’re going to freeze spending, why exempt those? It seems like blatant pandering to vets. His ambition to be president is consuming him. And, in the past couple of weeks, it looked like his campaign ran away from him. When he had previously said he would run a clean campaign, his running mate started accusing Obama of “pallin’ around with terrorists“. And that’s another thing: while I think Palin was a smart choice to shore up the “base” of voters and make McCain 50 times more appealing to Evangelicals (my bother admitted McCain didn’t interest him until Palin was selected because she seems to be a devout member of the Assemblies of God church), I don’t think she is qualified. She does look, as one person reported, “shockingly amateurish“. So those are reasons to vote against McCain. I’m sure that if I wanted to (because, to be frank, I knew I was going to vote for Obama before many of these reasons came out) I could find just as many damning statements to make against Obama. But that is part of what I don’t like about the campaign against Obama. Much of it (“Nobama”, “Barack Hussain Obama”) seems childish and stupid. Sure, that sort of stuff works for some people. But it isn’t attractive to me. And just to be clear, if I was going to let someone’s associates scare me away (Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, ACORN), I wouldn’t have anyone to vote for (Keating Five, ACORN, William Timmons). What about the issues? There was one consistent reason my family gave for voting against Obama: Abortion. Make no mistake: I do not like Obama’s position. But, suppose I thought I had to vote my concience on this issue alone. Suppose I thought that I must vote for a pro-life candidate. Neither party, the Republicans nor the Democrats, has given me that choice. McCain is not pro-life. But he’ll appoint conservative judges! Doubtful. McCain isn’t that conservative. And trying to get a clearly pro-life judge through a Democratically controlled senate just isn’t going to happen, even if that was what McCain wanted to do. From my point of view, there isn’t much else to consider. The economy? McCain is flailing around on the economy and doesn’t seem to have any ideas. He admitted long ago that he doesn’t know anything about the economy. Not that Obama is much better here. Since the economy tanked under the Republicans, the Democratic nominee gets all the political benefit without any work. In the end, it does come down to personality. Obama has more control over his temper. He can inspire people. He can think big while still being aware of budgetary constraints. I doubt he’ll be able to cut taxes as much as he says on those making less than $250,000, but at least he is honest about saying that we do have to pay for programs by raising money somewhere. Other people can push their candidate better than I can. I’m not looking for a savior in the political arena. I’m not even looking for the person who best represents what I believe. I’m not keeping track of promises, since, from a politician who has to push most of his ideas through two houses of congress, they’re meaningless. I’m looking for someone who can lead. Someone who can inspire people. Someone who can deal with people respectfully. Someone with an actual chance of being elected. For now, that person appears to be Obama.
Out There: People Who Live Without TV:
“I interviewed one guy who was 31, single, an artist living in Boston, who saw himself as countercultural,” Krcmar told LiveScience. “The next day I had an interview with a religious woman with ten children who lived in the Midwest. These people seem like they would disagree about almost everything, but if you ask them about television the things that came out of their mouths were almost identical.” [...] “It’s sort of counter-intuitive, because people think their kids would drive them nuts without TV,” Krcmar said. “But parents found that kids became very good at entertaining themselves and didn’t need to be entertained all the time by something that was lively and active. They didn’t complain about being bored.
Oh how I wish I didn’t have one (sometimes). (Just realized: I got this from Dan Lyke.)
Bikes to Rwanda « je vais où?:
These people are doing good things… if you like coffee you should definitely give this video a look.
I love a good cup of coffee. And I love bikes. Bikes to Rwanda combines this with my personal interest in the welfare of Rwanda to help support coffee growers there with inexpensive utility bikes. That’s a charity that I can really get behind.